NEW IPO Logo - by Charles Larry Home Search Browse About IPO Staff Links

1977 SALARY SURVEY

For Fulltime Park and Recreation Personnel in Illinois

by Dr. William E. O'Brien, Chairman Recreation Department, Southern Illinois University

Illinois Park and Recreation Association President Joe H. Doud, Executive Director Kay K. Forest and Research Committee Chairman Harold L. Robson asked this investigator to conduct a salary and fringe benefit study of Park and Recreation personnel in Illinois park districts. Since this investigator had conducted similar studies in previous years, it was decided to make a comparative study of the 1977 data with those of 1975; hopefully, studies will continue every two years so that trends may be noted.

The purpose was to gather and analyze data relative to salary and selected fringe benefits deemed important by full-time Park and Recreation personnel in Illinois park districts. The findings in the study will provide the basis for conclusions in matters important enough to professionals so that they could:

1. Be current as to the present status of salaries and selected fringe benefits.
2. Use these data for planning future courses of action in terms of recommendations in personnel matters.
3. Inform the members of the association as to their status in these areas.
4. Make comparisons with previous studies of similar design to determine trends, etc.
5. Provide data for general information and consultant work.

POPULATION INCLUDED IN THE STUDY

There were 148 Park Districts invited to participate. The main criterion for inclusion was to have at least one full-time person in one of the established personnel categories as listed in the questionnaire. There were 102 questionnaires returned (70%); of these, the following qualified and were included:

Assessed Valuation Number of Qualified Departments Responding
  1977 1975 + -
Under $50,000,000 16 25 -9
$50,000,000-100,000,000 34 34 0
$100,000,000-200,000,000 27 28 -1
&200,000,000-over 25 28 -3
  102 115 -13

In 1975 the return percent was 80. We were not as successsful in 1977 with a 70% return. It should be pointed out that there was some misunderstanding on the part of a few 1975 respondents as to what constituted a qualified rspondent. There were 248 questionnaires sent out in 1975 but in 1977 the questionnaires went only to those known to be qualified; hence, the difference in (Ns) in responses and various categories. This error will no longer occur.

One can easily note that 13 fewer responses were received in 1977. There were a fewer in the under 50 million category. This investigator suspects that some respondents in this category in 1975 increased in assessed valuation and moved into the 50-100 million category. The other categories were similar in responses in 1977 and 1975.

PERSONNEL STUDIED

Since the Park and Recreation field has many titles for the various positions, the researcher, with the assistance from President Doud and Executive Director Kay K. Forest, described the different positions in the questionnaire and asked the respondent to place his staff members in the most suitable position. These staff descriptions included:

1. Chief Executive of the Department
2. Assistant to the Chief Executive
3. Administrator in charge of Recreation
4. Administrator in charge of Park Operation
5. Supervisor/Foreman of Park Maintenance
6. Supervisor of Recreation, Community Center, etc.
7. Specialist, Naturalist, Crafts, Police, etc.
8. Facility Managers—ice rink, tennis, etc.

The respondents appeared to cooperate very well in placing their personnel in these categories. Where error was evident (or perhaps a difference in interpretation) the investigator used his judgement for placement. These cases were rare. It still must be remembered in reviewing the findings that the population in the study is not identical to 1975 because all of the 1977 population did not respond. Hopefully, we will one day have the exact populations. One other note, that is, the N's in the various categories changed also leading the investigator to suspect changes from 1975 assessed valuation categories to new ones in 1977 in which some park districts moved into higher assessed valuation recently. This action would affect the numbers of personnel in the various personnel categories. It is expected that these problems affect the findings. The reader is asked to accept the findings as current status report and to be used as a condition for planning, etc.

The data analysis is in two parts: Part One—Salary; Part Two—Fringe Benefits which will appear in the next issue. In the tables presenting the salary data, both the 1977 and 1975 totals are presented for the reader's pleasure. Comparisons can be made between the two studies. Salaries are presented in terms of annual salary.

COMPOSITE SALARIES

The status of composite salaries of all personnel included in the study is presented in Table 1. These data are reported in the various personnel categories. There were 600 positions reported in 1975. There were 572 positions reported in 1977. Analysis of Table 1 reveals that gains in dollar amounts were made in 18 of the personnel salary categories; 6 personnel salary categories reflected losses.

When reviewing the highest salary category for all positions, it can be noted that the highest gain in 1977 was $5,025 for supervisors of recreation, community centers, etc. The greatest loss in this same category was $6,500 for facility managers, etc. It may also be noted in the highest salary category that four of the personnel positions reported a gain and four reported losses.

When reviewing the lowest salary category for all positions, it can be noted that the greatest gain was for the supervisor or foreman of park maintenance was $2,876. It can also be noted

Illinois Parks and Recreation 12 January/February, 1978


Table 1

Composite of Comparative Salaries of All Full-Time Park and Recreation Personnel in the Various Leadership Categories in Illinois Park Districts for the Years 1977 and 1975

Annual Salary Description

 

Asst. to Chief Executive

Administrator in charge of Recreation

Administrator in charge of Park Operation

Supervisor or Foreman, Park Maintenance

Supervisor of Recreation, Community Centers, etc.

Specialist, Naturalist. Horticulturist Police, etc.

Facility Manager Ice, Tennis Facilities

Highest
1977

36,500

21,780

22,400

28,000

21,900

21,000

18,211

26,500

1975

33,400

22,200

27,170

26,977

25,488

15,975

16,260

33,000

Gain/Loss

+3,100

-420

-4,700

+1,023

-3,588

+ 5,025

+1,951

-6,500

Lowest
1977

11,700

8,500

7,200

4,600

7,296

5,568

7,800

8,111

1975

9,000

8,000

6,500

6,800

4,420

4,675

7,982

5,250

Gain/Loss

+2,700

+500

+700

-2,200

+2,876

+893

-182

+2,861

Mean
1977

20,684

15,509

13,829

15,589

12,828

11,321

12,654

13,842

1975

18,279

13,002

12,509

12,370

11,306

9,367

11,383

12,723

Gain/Loss

+ 2,405

+2,507

+1,320

+3,219

+1,522

+1,954

+1,271

+1,119


that the greatest loss was $2,200 for the category of administrator in charge of park operations. In the lowest salary category it may also be noted that six of the personnel categories were reported to have had gains and two reported to have had losses.

When reviewing the mean salary category for all personnel positions, it can be noted that the highest gain was $3,219 for administrators in charge of park operations. Gains were reported in all personnel categories for the mean salary in the comparitive study for salaries for full-time park and recreation personnel for 1975 and 1977.

VALUATION OF UNDER $50,000,000

In Table 2 are presented data reported by departments having assessed valuations of under $50,000,000. In 1975 there were 54 personnel positions reported. In the 1977 study there were 44 personnel positions reported. Analysis of Table 2 reveals that gains in dollar amounts were made in 13 of the personnel salary categories; 6 personnel salary categories reflected losses. No data were reported for the specialists, naturalists and so forth.

When reviewing the highest salary category for all positions, it can be noted that the highest gain in 1977 was $1,500 for the position of facility manager, ice, tennis and so forth. The greatest loss in this same personnel category was $2,890 for the assistant to the chief executive category.

When reviewing the lowest salary category for all positions, it can be noted that the greatest gain was for the facility manager, ice, tennis, etc. and that gain was $6,750. It can also be noted that the greatest loss was $2,200 for the category of administrator in charge of park operations.

When reviewing the mean salary for all personnel positions, it can be noted that the highest gain was $2,166 for supervisors or foremen of park maintenance. It can also be noted that the greatest loss was $326 in the category of supervisor of recreation, community centers and so forth. In the mean gain or loss status 5 of the 6 personnel categories indicated a gain; one reported a loss.

VALUATION OF $5,000,000 to $100,000,000

In Table 3 are presented data reported by departments having assessed valuations of $50-100,000,000. In 1975 there were 140 personnel positions reported. In the 1977 study there were 127 personnel positions reported. Analysis of Table 2 reveals that gains in dollar amounts were made in 11 personnel salary categories; 12 personnel salary categories reflected losses. One remained the same. The investigator suspects that possibly some of the 1975 under $50,000,000 assessed valuation departments had moved into the over $50,000,000 to $100,000,000 assessed valuation categories and, therefore, influenced the data.

When reviewing the highest salary category for all positions, it could be noted that the highest gain in 1977 was $5,647 for the position of administrator in charge of recreation. The greatest loss in this same category was $3,812 for the personnel category of specialist, naturalist, etc. Five of the eight personnel categories had gains and three did not.

When reviewing the lowest salary category for all positions, it can be noted that the greatest gain was for the assistant to the chief executive and that gain was $800. It can also be noted that the greatest loss was $2,300 for the category of administrator in charge of facilities, ice, tennis, special facilities, etc. It is interesting to note that 6 of the reporting personnel categories

Table 2
Comparative Salaries of Full-Time Park and Recreation Personnel In Illinois Park Districts with Assessed Valuation of Under 50,000,000 for the Years 1977 and 1975

Annual Salary Description

Chief Executive

Asst. to Chief Executive

Administrator in charge of Recreation

Administrator In charge of Park Operation

Supervisor or Foreman, Park Maintenance

Supervisor of Recreation, Community Center, etc,

Specialist, Naturalist, Horticulturist Police, etc.

Facility Manager Ice, Tennis Facilities,

Highest
1977

21,500

8,500

10,500

12,800

12,000

8,320

none

16,500

1975

21,300

11,390

12,480

12,300

10,920

8,500

none

15,000

Gain/Loss

+200

-2,890

-1,980

+500

+1,080

-180

none

+1,500

Lowest
1977

11,700

none

9,000

4,600

8,000

7,100

none

12,000

1975

9,000

8,000

6,500

6,800

4,420

7,200

none

5,250

Gain/Loss

+2,700

——

+2,500

-2,200

+ 3,580

-100

none

+6,750

Mean
1977

14,075

none

9,683

9,883

10,506

7,567

none

12,125

1975

12,390

9,695

9,443

9,167

8,340

7,893

none

10,125

Gain/Loss

+1,685

——

+240

+716

+2,166

-326

none

+2,000


Illinois Parks and Recreation 13 January/February, 1978


Table 3 Comparative Salaries of Full-Time Park and Recreation Personnel in Illinois Park Districts with Assessed Valuation of 50,000,000-100,000,000 for the Years 1977 and 1975

Annual Salary Description

Chief Executive

Asst. to Chief Executive

Administrator in charge of Recreation

Administrator in charge of Park Operation

Supervisor or Foreman, Park Maintensince

Supervisor of Recreation, Community Center, etc.

Specialist, Natunillst, Horticulturist Police, etc.

FaciUty Manager Ice, Tennis Facilities,

Highest
1977

25,000

17,600

19,480

18,000

16,200

14,000

10,500

16,000

1975

26,000

12,000

13,833

16,491

18,000

12,720

14,312

14,200

Gain/Loss

-1,000

+5,600

+5,647

+1,509

-1,800

+1,280

-3,812

+1,800

Lowest
1977

9,000

9,200

7,200

8,700

7,400

5,568

8,500

10,000

1975

9,000

8,400

7,500

8,868

8,500

7,000

8,800

12,300

Gain/Loss

Same

+800

-300

-168

-1,100

-1,632

-300

-2,300

Mean
1977

13,120

13,120

11,917

13,109

11,432

10,091

9,333

12,250

1975

16,273

10,817

10,511

11,629

10,816

9,419

10,870

13,368

Gain/Loss

-3,153

+2,313

+1,406

+1,480

+616

+672

-1,537

-1,118


indicated losses as compared with one gain. Again, some of the 1975 under 50,000,000 assessed valuation departments may have moved into the 50,000,000 to 100,000,000 category and thereby influenced the status.

When reviewing the mean salary category for all personnel positions, it can be noted that the highest gain was $2,313 in the personnel position of assistant to the chief executive. It can also be noted that the greatest loss proved to be $3,153 for the position of chief executive in the mean gain or loss category. It is interesting to note here that 5 of the 3 categories reported gains as compared with 3 who reported losses.

VALUATION OF $100-200,000,000

In Table 4 are presented data reported by departments having assessed valuations of $100,000,000 to 200,000,000. In 1975 there were 141 personnel positions reported. In the 1977 study there were 158 personnel positions reported. Analysis of Table 4 reveals that gains in dollar amounts were made in 18 personnel salary categories; 6 personnel salary categories reflected losses. It is interesting to note that in the mean gain or loss category all 8 personnel categories reflected a gain in dollar amounts.

When reviewing the highest salary category for all positions, it can be noted that the highest gain in 1977 was $6,385 for the position of supervisor or foreman of park maintenance. The greatest loss in this category was $5,000 for the facility managers, ice, tennis, and so forth.

When reviewing the lowest salary category for all positions, it can be noted that the greatest gain was for the position of administrator in charge of park operations. It can also be noted that the greatest loss was $1000 for the category of administrator in charge of recreation. It is interesting to note that 6 of the reporting personnel categories indicated gains as compared with two reporting losses.

When reviewing the mean salary category for all personnel positions it can be noted that the highest gain was $2,162 in the personnel position of chief executive. It is interesting to note that all 8 of the personnel categories reflected a gain in the mean 1977 salaries compared with 1975.

VALUATION OF OVER $200,000,000

In Table 5 are presented the data reported by departments having assessed valuations of over $200,000,000. In 1975 there were 265 personnel positions reported. In the 1977 study there were 243 personnel positions reported. Analysis of Table 5 reveals that gains in dollar amounts were made in 18 personnel salary categories; six personnel salary categories reflected losses.

When reviewing the highest salary category for all positions, it can be noted that the highest gain in 1977 was $5,025 for the position of supervisor of recreation, community centers, and so forth. The greatest loss in the same category was $6,500 for the personnel category of facility managers, ice, tennis, special facilities, etc. Four of the personnel categories reflected gains and four reflected losses.

When reviewing the lowest salary category for all positions, it can be noted that the greatest gain was for the chief executive and that gain was $5,304. It can also be noted that the greatest loss was $182 for the category of specialist naturalist, horticulturist, etc. It is interesting to note that seven categories reflected gains and one reflected a loss.

When reviewing the mean salary category for all personnel

Table 4 Comparative Salaries of Full-Time Park and Recreation Personnel in Illinois Park Districts with Assessed Valuation of 100,000,000 - 200,000,000 for the Years 1977 and 1975

Annual Salary Description

Chief Executive

Asst. to Chief Executive

Administrator in charge of Recreation

Administrator In charge of Park Operation

Supervisor or Foreman, Park Maintenance

Supervisor of Recreation, Community Center, etc,

Specialist, Naturalist, Horticulturist Police, etc.

Facility Manager Ice, Tennis Facilities

Highest
1977

31,500

21,780

19,800

21,600

21,900

13,460

15,303

19,000

1975

32,000

18,300

21,000

23,200

15,515

12,000

9,500

24,000

Gain/Loss

-500

+3,480

-1,200

-1,600

+6,385

+1,460

+5,803

-5,000

Lowest
1977

14,100

11,130

9,000

12,000

9,200

7,680

8,800

8,111

1975

13,200

9,500

10,000

8,960

9,100

4,675

8,500

8,501

Gain/Loss

+900

+1,630

-1,000

+3,040

+100

+3,005

+300

-390

Mean
1977

23,038

15,757

13,975

15,772

13,370

9,989

10,655

14,065

1975

20,876

14,360

13,509

14,494

11,898

8,842

8,833

13,774

Gain/Loss

+2,162

+1,397

+466

+1,278

+1,472

+1,147

+1,822

+291


Illinois Parks and Recreation 14 January/February, 1978


Table 5 Comparative Salaries of Full-Time Park and Recreation Personnel in Illinois Park Districts with Assessed Valuation of Over 200,000,000 for the Years-1977 and 1975

Annual Salary Description

Chief Executive

Asst. to Chief Executive

Administrator in charge of Recreation

Administrator in charge of Park Operation

Supervisor or Foreman Park Maintenance

Supervisor of Recreation, Community Center, etc.

Specialist, Naluralitl. Horticulturist Police, etc.

Facility Manager Ice Tennis Facilities,

Highest
1977

36,500

20,800

22,400

28,000

18,000

21,000

18,211

26,500

1975

33,400

22,200

27,100

26,977

25,488

15,975

16,260

33,000

Gain/Loss

+3,100

-1,400

-4,700

+1,023

-7,488

+5,025

+1,951

-6,500

Lowest
1977

19,500

12,745

12,000

9,024

7,296

8,500

7,800

8,040

1975

14,196

9,000

10,000

8,436

6,618

7,500

7,982

7,500

Gain/Loss

+5,304

+3,745

+2,000

+588

+678

+1,000

-182

+540

Mean
1977

26,442

17,311

17,080

18,536

14,219

12,540

13,421

14,244

1975

23,726

16,200

16,570

14,191

14,277

11,319

11,445

13,625

Gain/Loss

+2,716

+1,111

+510

+4,345

-58

+1,221

+1,976

+619


positions, it can be noted that the highest gain was $4345 in the personnel position of administrator in charge of park operations. It can also be noted that the greatest loss proved to be $58 for the position of supervisor or foreman of park maintenance. Seven of the ten categories reflected gains and one reflected a loss when considering the mean.

SUMMARY OF SALARY FINDINGS

It would be easier to see the true picture if all departments had reported. For example, in personnel reported, we had 600 in 1975; in 1977 we had 572. Yet, we had 13 fewer departments reporting in 1977. Had some of the departments not reporting been in the $100-200,000,000 this figure might be quite different in terms of more personnel in 1977.

We now note that there are also many different types of facility managers. Particularly in the $100,000,000-0ver $200,000,000 categories. This investigator will rework the data for a more precise presentation for this situation. A special report will be made to the Illinois professionals relative to the type manager and their salaries.

The reader can note that gains are reported consistantly for most of the categories especially in the mean salaries. For example, the composite mean is 100% gain in 1977.

(Editor's note: Part 2, Fringe Benefits will appear in the March/April issue. The JPRA Board expresses its sincere appreciation to Dr. O'Brien for his research on the Salary Study.)

Illinois Parks and Recreation 15 January/February, 1978


|Home| |Search| |Back to Periodicals Available| |Table of Contents| |Back to Illinois Parks and Recreation 1978|
Illinois Periodicals Online (IPO) is a digital imaging project at the Northern Illinois University Libraries funded by the Illinois State Library