NEW IPO Logo - by Charles Larry Home Search Browse About IPO Staff Links

SPECIAL FEATURE

Gubernatorial Candidates Speak Out

The following question was sent to Neil Hartigan and Jim Edgar:

Park and forest preserve districts have a tremendous impact on the Illinois economy, the health of Illinois citizens and the environment in which we live.

Currently, park and forest preserve districts depend primarily on local property taxes for funding. There is no state funding except for limited matching grants for land acquisition and development, including bicycle pathways. The irony is that the constituents we serve are demanding more recreational opportunities, facilities and open spaces; yet, it is these same citizens who oftentimes do not want more property taxes.

What suggestions do you have for the park and forest preserve districts to resolve this problem? Please bear in mind we do not want to rely too heavily on fees and charges, since in some communities, this would mean that only a certain group of individuals who have adequate disposable income will be able to appreciate and participate in recreational opportunities. Parks and recreation should be for everyone. Here's how they answered:

Neil F. Hartigan

Attorney General Neil F. Hartigan

Illinois made significant progress with the passage of Senate Bill 1463, establishing the Open Space Lands Acquisition and Development Fund (OSLAD). The $14 million to fund 50 percent matching grants is the most money ever dedicated to this type of program--but it will not take us far in meeting our goals for improved open space acquisition and recreational opportunities.

For this reason, it is important to ensure that the grant monies are being spent in a manner consistent with the intended purpose. Accountability should extend to all levels of government if we are to be certain that our limited funds are not wasted and are channeled to the most important and the most dedicated programs to serving the needs of the public.

As governor, I am committed to do performance audits on

Jim Edgar

Secretary of State Jim Edgar

Throughout my campaign for governor, I have emphasized that the people of Illinois should look beyond the rhetoric of the candidates to their records. As a candidate for governor, I am a strong supporter of park and forest preserve districts. But more importantly, before becoming a candidate, I demonstrated my support by speaking out publicly on proposals to provide additional financial support to your programs.

During this past session of the legislature, I supported SB 1463 and wrote to the governor advocating his approval of OSLAD funding. My support was based on the reality that federal funds for open space land acquisition and development were no longer available. Ten years ago, Illinois received nearly $15 million in federal land, water, and conservation funds. This year, federal funds for the same program amounted

Illinois Parks and Recreation 18 May/June 1990


Hartigan

the 278 boards, commissions, and departments to evaluate where money is being spent and where money is being wasted. I believe that such an audit will identify wasted resources in State government and will free existing funds to be considered, based on performance and results, for programs such as education and local park district needs.

In addition, available funds identified should be seriously considered for the newly formed Illinois Conservation Park and Recreation Foundation to assist in the procurement of additional alternative funding for our local park districts. The Foundation provides a unique opportunity for comprehensive planning, targeting key resources and identifying public, private and civic support for district needs.

As we all know, Illinois ranks 46th out of 50 states in the dollars returned to Illinois by the federal government. As governor, I will make a personal effort to significantly increase federal Land and Water Conservation funding to the states. Illinois needs leadership and comprehensive planning in the areas of conservation and environmental protection.

"l am willing to work 'hand-in-hand' with the local park districts to develop and implement methods to provide additional funding—local impact fees are another option for ...funding."

The state park system is an important resource for Illinois, yet local needs are better served at the local level. I believe that park districts have provided a great service to the state and support the continued utilization of the current district structure. Park districts are accountable to the populations served and the local needs can best be ascertained by the individuals closest to the public. Unlike many regulated activities, parks provide a service whereby statewide controls do not account for localized needs.

I am willing to work "hand-in-hand" with the local park disricts to develop and implement methods to provide additional funding. For example, local impact fees are another option for park district funding.

As you already know, I was responsible for the largest acquisition of park lands in the history of the program-acquiring 50 new parks for Chicago and developing a strategic plan for the acquisition of 130 additional areas. I initiated the first park district system to obtain federal grant monies providing for park development-which served as a model for other urban communities.

I personally prosecuted cases of assault within parks, drafted an ordinance protecting First Amendment rights of park patrons, and have worked to ensure that the disabled are provided access to our parks. I was honored by an award presented by Chicago Park District employees in appreciation for my work protecting employee safety.

My involvement and dedication to improved parks will continue. And, as governor, I look forward to working with your association.

Edgar

to $650,000, and next year federal support may be down to zero.

With federal funds nearly gone, public officials have been faced with two choices: tolerate a severe setback in acquisition and development of open lands or find an alternative source of stable funding. The problems and demands present throughout Illinois, especially in our urban areas, made the first choice unacceptable. Leaders from your organizations and districts worked hard to fashion a workable bill in legislature. The result was SB 1463, and it will provide a stable funding source needed for the years ahead.

Legislators, of course, had to vote yes or no on the bill, and Gov. Thompson had to sign it. I believe that I may be the only other elected constitutional officer to take a position supporting the legislation.

In addition, I drafted the final version of SB 787, which will provide over $5 million a year for acquisition and development of bike paths. I believe a substantial portion of the new funds should be available to your local agencies.

The combination of these two pieces of legislation represent the kind of commitment state government needed to make.

"I would be a strong advocate for reestablishing federal programs to supplement state and local grant programs. I believe that the best quality of service is provided at the local level."

As governor, I would continue to recognize the need for stable financial support so that your districts can meet the needs of your respectivie areas. Dependable financing is also important so that you can plan for the future and know what resources will be available. The open space and recreational demands for the 21st Century mean that we should not retreat from our support for stable funding.

I would be a strong advocate for reestabilishing federal programs to supplement state and local grant programs. In the last decade, funds that previously went to OSLAD projects were redirected, primarily to help offset the federal deficit. While I am supportive of deficit reduction, it does not seem fair that all federal dollars for the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) have been redirected.

Pending in Congress is the American Hertiage Trust Act that would dedicate federal dollars to LWCF. I support this effort, and as governor would direct my staff to work for the passage of the bill or similar legislation.

I also would expect my departments to adhere to my philosophy of government partnership. I believe that the best quality of service is provided at the local level. As the architect of the state's literacy program, I became even more convinced that state government should use local agencies. The literacy program disperses all of its grants to local groups, and the results have reinforced my feelings about the importance of local delivery of services.

Illinois Parks and Recreation 19 May/June 1990


|Home| |Search| |Back to Periodicals Available| |Table of Contents| |Back to Illinois Parks & Recreation 1990|
Illinois Periodicals Online (IPO) is a digital imaging project at the Northern Illinois University Libraries funded by the Illinois State Library