NEW IPO Logo - by Charles Larry Home Search Browse About IPO Staff Links
DEFINING REGIONS:
A TEACHING STRATEGY

Overview

Main Ideas
One of the most stimulating activities for students is for them to create their own maps and then to try to decide what those maps mean. There is the fun of watching geographical patterns emerge, and there is the intellectual challenge of explaining these patterns. The concept of region is explained, and material is provided so that students can create their own regions. There are no right or wrong answers. The success of the exercise must be measured by the extent to which it stimulates debate on regions, discussion of cause and effect, and interest in Illinois history.

The "historic present" is a useful method by which geography and history can be combined in the classroom. To discover the unique character of an area — in this case Illinois — at a particular time — in this case 1870 — one needs some basic facts, a willingness to think in terms of what was really important to people at that period, and a little imagination. Here are some of the things that might be important in interpreting the maps that the students will create. Illinois is basically a flat state (see Figure1); there are only four fairly small areas where bedrock dominates, and most of that land is too rocky and hilly for much farming: the Galena country in the northwest, the Lincoln Hills in Calhoun and southern Pike County, the Salem Plateau in the southwest, and the Shawnee Hills in the far south.

Illinois was settled by quite different groups. Upland Southerners came from Kentucky and Tennessee and moved north, while settlers from the eastern states came somewhat later and generally moved from east to west. Of the last group, the New Englanders who settled the northernmost counties of the state were perhaps the most different from the Upland Southerners.

48


Until a few years before 1870 you could not farm until you put up a fence to keep out the neighbors' livestock, which did not have to be fenced in; this meant that trees for fences were essential for settlement, and it helps to explain why the last area in Illinois to be settled was the treeless Grand Prairie. Substantial parts of that zone had yet to be occupied in 1870. Many of the larger river valleys in Illinois are lined with rocky cliffs or swampy lowlands, which presented problems for farmers. Growing seasons in Illinois become shorter as one goes north, which in turn influenced the selection of crops. Corn was already the biggest money-making crop in Illinois in 1870, and huge amounts were being shipped to other states and countries. However, almost all farm work was done with the aid of horses, requiring farmers everywhere in Illinois to devote a large number of acres to oats to feed their work animals. The railroad network was making rapid progress in Illinois, but many areas were not yet served. Chicago had grown extremely rapidly between 1850 and 1870, and in 1870. Chicago was the only really large city in the state. In 1870 most people in Illinois lived on farms, and except perhaps in Cook County, population changes between 1860 and 1870 depended on changes in farming. Remember too, that the southern part of the state was settled first, so those counties generally had less room for new farms than did those in the north.

Connection with the Curriculum
Focusing on the region can facilitate an emphasis on higher level thinking. Students must process a great deal of information in the analysis of a variety of topics. Synthesis occurs when they attempt to understand the interrelationships of those topics and arrive at composite pictures of unique regions. Employing the temporal dimension of history and the spatial dimension of geography offers a powerful combination by which students can understand a part of their world.

Teaching Level
Grades 7-12

Materials for Each Student

• U.S. outline map

• 1870 data

• Illinois base map (with counties labeled)

• Illinois physiographic map

• Colored pencils or markers (optional)

Horse and Carriage

49

Identification of data categories:

  1. Population per square mile

  2. % population growth, 1860-1870

  3. % area in improved land

  4. % woodland

  5. % farms of 100 or more acres

  6. % farms of fewer than 50 acres

  7. % of total crop production in corn. (Note: Oats dominant in Boone, Cook, DeKalb, Du Page, Kane, Kankakee, Lake, and Will. Wheat dominant in Jersey, Monroe, Randolph, and St. Clair.)

  8. $ value of market gardening per square mile

  9. $ value of orchard products per square mile

  10. Number of milk cows per square mile

  11. Number of cattle per square mile (excluding milk cows and oxen)

  12. Number of swine per square mile

1870 Data

County

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Adams

66

36

55

21

24

40

45

57

200

13

19

66

Alexander

45

124

9

12

15

43

79

8

23

2

3

21

Bond

35

34

60

18

35

30

56

1

105

10

13

45

Boone

46

34

76

17

41

23

34

1

82

25

28

28

Brown

40

23

29

48

22

44

62

3

19

7

16

53

Bureau

37

22

72

8

46

17

65

3

68

16

33

58

Calhoun

26

27

24

40

14

64

49

6

126

7

9

44

Carroll

38

40

66

10

45

23

50

3

44

18

33

59

Cass

31

2

39

14

50

20

79

0

6

6

17

34

Champaign

33

123

66

3

29

39

79

5

42

9

18

36

Christian

29

94

53

4

47

18

67

1

45

6

11

49

Clark

37

25

37

31

21

47

59

10

89

8

14

37

Clay

34

70

49

27

25

47

74

8

69

8

13

43

Clinton

35

48

49

16

33

26

43

6

87

8

9

38

Coles

50

78

64

14

27

46

81

2

56

11

22

66

Cook

365

141

57

3

38

31

24

156

20

24

15

16

Grawford

31

20

37

27

25

38

61

0

57

7

10

44

Cumberland

35

47

34

18

29

31

59

1

32

7

10

29

DeKalb

37

22

85

4

59

9

36

4

16

23

29

42

DeWitt

37

36

66

12

35

32

79

48

83

11

19

74

Douglas

32

88

55

4

40

28

84

1

44

8

28

42

Du Page

50

13

76

8

53

15

24

22

63

32

23

25

Edgar

34

27

67

17

32

46

78

0

98

11

33

62

Edwards

34

39

41

40

25

29

58

1

38

9

13

60

Effingham

33

100

39

18

21

47

51

0

74

9

11

36

Fayette

28

75

41

20

23

47

52

2

105

9

11

34

Ford

19

359

45

1

39

19

73

2

2

6

12

20

Franklin

31

34

30

2

13

64

66

20

90

8

14

62

Fulton

44

14

41

22

32

31

65

1

92

10

18

67

Gallatin

35

38

24

33

7

71

82

2

3

6

7

46

Greene

37

25

50

27

32

40

62

2

50

8

24

58

Grundy

35

44

72

2

48

8

50

3

7

16

30

20

Hamilton

30

31

32

34

8

66

70

2

110

8

9

57

Hancock

45

24

61

21

32

29

57

5

85

12

21

56

Hardin

28

36

24

39

12

65

74

0

2

6

8

45

Henderson

34

32

59

15

39

22

75

41

131

12

23

74

Henry

43

72

50

5

43

14

67

0

19

11

19

42

Iroquois

23

109

45

8

36

28

60

2

8

9

19

19

Jackson

33

105

21

23

8

68

56

6

113

5

7

45

Jasper

23

34

29

21

19

51

65

0

18

6

10

25

Jefferson

31

38

33

26

19

55

69

6

55

7

11

44

Jersey

40

25

39

22

34

33

45

1

98

8

21

43

Jo Daviess

46

2

41

21

26

35

52

11

79

17

30

57


50


County

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Johnson

33

20

26

-

10

63

67

0

126

5

5

40

Kane

75

30

72

10

56

18

37

7

44

31

25

29

Kankakee

36

58

72

3

41

23

41

4

9

18

25

24

Kendall

39

-5

80

7

55

10

54

1

58

19

27

46

Knox

55

38

72

7

41

26

69

5

94

15

33

86

Lake

46

15

72

7

41

24

36

12

59

27

24

29

LaSalle

61

26

73

7

47

11

62

8

38

15

26

32

Lawrence

34

36

26

21

23

39

62

0

46

8

13

47

Lee

37

54

69

3

41

17

52

14

24

18

27

35

Livingston

30

170

56

2

39

16

59

1

4

10

14

27

Logan

37

62

81

7

42

22

84

5

43

10

9

77

Macon

46

93

55

5

41

20

75

8

43

9

14

51

Macoupin

38

33

53

15

44

23

44

3

40

8

14

37

Madison

61

41

55

19

26

39

56

96

99

11

8

72

Marion

36

62

37

13

.25

49

64

3

101

8

12

38

Marshall

44

26

67

11

35

25

68

14

75

14

18

52

Mason

30

48

61

9

48

24

83

3

44

8

11

31

Massac

40

54

16

22

13

35

58

3

38

4

4

23

McDonough

45

32

69

19

38

19

68

3

74

12

24

70

McHenry

39

7

59

6

36

30

44

17

42

27

24

35

McLean

46

88

67

5

47

16

75

10

45

10

23

52

Menard

37

22

67

17

37

34

86

0

71

11

32

86

Mercer

34

25

63

13

47

22

72

2

61

14

28

75

Monroe

33

2

37

34

14

46

40

5

43

7

4

34

Montgomery

36

83

61

11

31

40

52

6

58

9

11

49

Morgan

50

29

81

17

42

34

85

41

74

10

53

78

Moultrie

32

62

69

12

26

44

78

2

133

10

20

69

Ogle

36

20

65

9

56

11

61

9

27

17

29

44

Peoria

77

25

43

12

34

28

63

31

46

10

15

57

Perry

31

44

30

24

20

52

34

2

46

7

8

33

Piatt

25

78

34

2

50

19

83

0

20

5

12

29

Pike

37

13

44

24

25

42

53

3

34

9

15

62

Pope

31

70

23

37

11

60

69

8

79

5

7

34

Pulaski

43

121

9

6

7

72

76

108

140

4

7

28

Putnam

39

12

31

14

47

25

72

34

72

9

18

34

Randolph

36

21

38

43

18

46

26

2

112

8

9

42

Richland

36

32

33

18

26

38

57

3

24

8

11

34

Rock Island

70

42

57

12

32

33

71

39

163

18

30

63

Saline

33

36

29

29

8

74

78

2

9

8

9

53

Sangamon

54

43

76

9

44

29

85

32

95

10

30

88

Schuyler

40

19

34

22

21

40

55

0

73

10

19

54

Scott

42

16

53

28

37

35

73

3

35

9

24

69

Shelby

34

74

65

16

31

40

65

0

34

10

14

58

Stark

37

19

75

7

44

13

71

0

51

14

26

92

St. Clair

76

35

54

18

27

33

40

139

85

9

7

44

Stephenson

54

21

71

12

39

21

47

4

42

19

27

61

Tazewell

43

30

55

11

40

22

72

21

118

10

17

53

Union

40

47

29

31

7

77

69

59

363

7

10

61

Vermilion

34

90

63

9

26

51

78

3

64

11

26

58

Wabash

39

20

38

26

18

34

57

0

10

8

10

46

Warren

43

26

77

8

41

17

77

5

82

15

31

96

Washington

31

28

49

16

44

22

41

10

130

7

8

37

Wayne

28

61

32

32

12

63

67

1

134

8

13

55

White

34

36

29

25

11

58

74

0

54

7

8

50

Whiteside

40

47

66

5

46

19

60

2

57

19

32

55

Will

51

47

78

4

51

16

35

5

41

22

29

25

Williamson

41

42

47

43

9

60

65

1

56

9

12

71

Winnebago

57

20

73

11

46

19

45

38

92

2

31

38

Woodford

36

43

67

7

38

15

66

2

89

12

20

83


51

Objectives for Each Student
The student will:

• Draw the approximate boundaries of the Midwest region on a U.S. base map and list those phenomena that most significantly influence the boundaries.

• Map one category of data provided for Illinois in 1870 using recommended procedures.

• Using the maps they have already produced, establish, map, and justify in writing the agricultural regions of Illinois in 1870.

SUGGESTIONS FOR
TEACHING THE LESSON

Opening the Lesson
• Begin the lesson by asking students to identify the characteristics that they associate with some region with which they are familiar. For example, Where is the South? The Great Plains? The Middle East? What are the characteristics of the region? How is it distinguishable from surrounding regions? How can you tell when you are entering or leaving the region?

• Distribute outline maps of the United States and ask students to list primary characteristics of and draw boundaries around what they consider to be the Midwest, first individually, then in small groups of three or four. Display the maps for inspection. Students will probably find they generally agree on a certain core of states, but disagree about areas on the margins. Their experiences will be similar in the following exercise on Illinois agricultural regions in 1870.

Developing the Lesson
Assign to each student a category of data to map. An equal number of counties can be placed in each of four categories, or four categories can be determined by an equal range of data values. Students then create maps by shading appropriate counties, using a uniform shading scheme so that maps can be compared. Highest values on the completed maps should jump out at the viewer. For example, fully shade the highest value, use crosshatching for the second, diagonal lines for the third, and small dots for the lowest category. Colors enliven maps, but too many bright colors are distracting.

Colors selected must reveal the range of highest to lowest values at a glance.

Values at a Glance

Such maps are called choropleth maps, and they are critical tools for geographers. This mapping stage is fairly time consuming, but it can be done as homework, and teachers will find that in the process of mapping students will learn a great deal about the geography of Illinois. Mapping programs on computers can do this rapidly.

Each student-produced map should contain TODALSIGS, the elements of good mapmaking: T = title, 0 = orientation (minimum of a North arrow), D = date, A = author, L = legend, S = scale, I = index, G = grid, and S = source. Index is not necessary in this exercise, and grid (latitude and longitude) can be noted along the map's margins to avoid clutter.

When the maps are completed, tape them to a wall or chalkboard, and give students a chance to examine the patterns illustrated. Then ask students to look for relationships by identifying areas where several patterns correspond. Are areas where corn dominates also those that have little woodland and have experienced rapid population growth? Does farm size differ from north to south? Why? Do the areas settled at an early date differ from those settled later?

52


Distribute to each student a copy of the Illinois Physiographic Regions map and briefly describe the categories it displays. Ask students: How do their maps correspond with the map of physical regions? What does the information tell about the relationship between farmers and the environment? What advantages or disadvantages were posed by location and the environment? How were the disadvantages overcome? How does your particular county fit into the overall pattern? Is your county similar to or dissimilar from its neighbors? Do not fall into the trap of thinking that physiographic regions must correspond with agricultural regions in any exact way.

Once students have explored those questions, arrange students in groups of three or four, and instruct each group to create its own overall map, which will be titled Agricultural Regions of Illinois in 1870. Five to eight regions of varying sizes should be identified. Each should have its own descriptive name, should consist of several characteristics that seem to belong together, and be accompanied by a written defense. Tape the completed maps to the chalkboard for inspection.

Concluding the Lesson
Lead a discussion of students' ideas about Illinois regions. What are the merits of the various maps produced? What problems were encountered? How were they resolved? Can the class agree on one regional classification system? Could similar techniques be used to create regions for larger areas of the world?

Extending the Lesson
The answers to these questions could provide the basis for greater in-depth studies, either for individuals or for the class. Students could be asked to assume the roles of young men or women sent west to look for new farms to purchase in 1870. After traveling the state, they must write letters to their families explaining what they have seen in various parts of the state and why they are recommending particular places for new homes.

Assessing Student Learning
Choropleth maps can be collected for a grade, but the agricultural regions maps and accompanying rationales are better for the purpose of evaluating students' understanding of the concept region. Subjective observations of students working in groups on agricultural regions may also provide insight to student understanding.

53

Fig. 1 Counties of Illinois

54


Fig. 2 - Physipgraphic Regions of Illinois

Click Here to return to the Article

55

|Home| |Search| |Back to Periodicals Available| |Table of Contents| |Back to Illinois History Teacher 1994|
Illinois Periodicals Online (IPO) is a digital imaging project at the Northern Illinois University Libraries funded by the Illinois State Library